Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Wednesday 8/20/08

This is why I wouldn't want to be a school board member.

Vermilion, Ohio schools Superintendent Philip Pempin, head football coach Frank Horvath and other school officials met Tuesday to discuss whether a 17-year-old boy should be allowed play after he admitted to juvenile delinquency for gross sexual imposition earlier this summer.

The conviction stems from a May 2007 drinking binge where the boy had sex with a classmate who was passed out.

The crime did not happen at school, but the district's policy states a student-athlete can be disqualified for any criminal activity.

read the complete story here from the Cleveland Plain dealer and Cleveland.com.

This story has the message boards buzzing and a lot of people talking.

what are your thoughts. Should a 17-year old boy, convicted of rape be able to participate in high school extra-curricular activities? Heck, should he even be aloud in school with other kids?




2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

He's a sex offender and shouldn't even be in school!

August 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, he does need to understand that he is at the age to suffer the consequences of his actions.

August 20, 2008 at 4:26 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home